rcutorture: Fix rcu_torture_fwd_cb_cr() data race

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078428

[ Upstream commit 6040072 ]

On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores
against later loads.  This means that this statement:

	rfcp->rfc_next = NULL;

Can be reordered to follow this statement:

	WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);

Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically,
this statement:

	rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next)

KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>

Author: paulmckrcu

kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c

@@ -2186,7 +2186,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_fwd_cb_cr(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rfp->rcu_fwd_lock, flags);
 	rfcpp = rfp->rcu_fwd_cb_tail;
 	rfp->rcu_fwd_cb_tail = &rfcp->rfc_next;
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);
+	smp_store_release(rfcpp, rfcp);
 	WRITE_ONCE(rfp->n_launders_cb, rfp->n_launders_cb + 1);
 	i = ((jiffies - rfp->rcu_fwd_startat) / (HZ / FWD_CBS_HIST_DIV));
 	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(rfp->n_launders_hist))