Skip to content

Commit bfc01dd

Browse files
committed
Revert "net: xfrm: Add '_rcu' tag for rcu protected pointer in netns_xfrm"
This reverts commit f10e001. This commit was just wrong. It caused a lot of syzbot warnings, so just revert it. Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
1 parent 6ee02a5 commit bfc01dd

File tree

2 files changed

+8
-24
lines changed

2 files changed

+8
-24
lines changed

include/net/netns/xfrm.h

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct netns_xfrm {
5757
struct list_head inexact_bins;
5858

5959

60-
struct sock __rcu *nlsk;
60+
struct sock *nlsk;
6161
struct sock *nlsk_stash;
6262

6363
u32 sysctl_aevent_etime;

net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c

Lines changed: 7 additions & 23 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1071,22 +1071,6 @@ static inline int xfrm_nlmsg_multicast(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
10711071
return nlmsg_multicast(nlsk, skb, pid, group, GFP_ATOMIC);
10721072
}
10731073

1074-
/* A similar wrapper like xfrm_nlmsg_multicast checking that nlsk is still
1075-
* available.
1076-
*/
1077-
static inline int xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
1078-
u32 pid)
1079-
{
1080-
struct sock *nlsk = rcu_dereference(net->xfrm.nlsk);
1081-
1082-
if (!nlsk) {
1083-
kfree_skb(skb);
1084-
return -EPIPE;
1085-
}
1086-
1087-
return nlmsg_unicast(nlsk, skb, pid);
1088-
}
1089-
10901074
static inline unsigned int xfrm_spdinfo_msgsize(void)
10911075
{
10921076
return NLMSG_ALIGN(4)
@@ -1211,7 +1195,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_spdinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
12111195
err = build_spdinfo(r_skb, net, sportid, seq, *flags);
12121196
BUG_ON(err < 0);
12131197

1214-
return xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, r_skb, sportid);
1198+
return nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, r_skb, sportid);
12151199
}
12161200

12171201
static inline unsigned int xfrm_sadinfo_msgsize(void)
@@ -1270,7 +1254,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
12701254
err = build_sadinfo(r_skb, net, sportid, seq, *flags);
12711255
BUG_ON(err < 0);
12721256

1273-
return xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, r_skb, sportid);
1257+
return nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, r_skb, sportid);
12741258
}
12751259

12761260
static int xfrm_get_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
@@ -1290,7 +1274,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
12901274
if (IS_ERR(resp_skb)) {
12911275
err = PTR_ERR(resp_skb);
12921276
} else {
1293-
err = xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
1277+
err = nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
12941278
}
12951279
xfrm_state_put(x);
12961280
out_noput:
@@ -1353,7 +1337,7 @@ static int xfrm_alloc_userspi(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
13531337
goto out;
13541338
}
13551339

1356-
err = xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
1340+
err = nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, resp_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
13571341

13581342
out:
13591343
xfrm_state_put(x);
@@ -1919,8 +1903,8 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
19191903
if (IS_ERR(resp_skb)) {
19201904
err = PTR_ERR(resp_skb);
19211905
} else {
1922-
err = xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, resp_skb,
1923-
NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
1906+
err = nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, resp_skb,
1907+
NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
19241908
}
19251909
} else {
19261910
xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, err ? 0 : 1, true);
@@ -2078,7 +2062,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_ae(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
20782062
err = build_aevent(r_skb, x, &c);
20792063
BUG_ON(err < 0);
20802064

2081-
err = xfrm_nlmsg_unicast(net, r_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
2065+
err = nlmsg_unicast(net->xfrm.nlsk, r_skb, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
20822066
spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
20832067
xfrm_state_put(x);
20842068
return err;

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)