Skip to content

Conversation

@rohangujarathi
Copy link
Member

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
  • I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
  • I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
  • I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@rohangujarathi rohangujarathi requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2023 20:19
@rohangujarathi rohangujarathi requested review from mufaddal-rohawala and removed request for a team May 5, 2023 20:19
@rohangujarathi rohangujarathi force-pushed the remote_function_fix branch from 3d5c5b2 to 8a84034 Compare May 5, 2023 21:02
methods that are not available via PyPI or conda. Default value is ``False``.
instance_count (int): The number of instances to use. Defaults to 1.
Remote function do not support instance_count > 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion framing the statement as NOTE: Remote function does not support . . .

@rohangujarathi rohangujarathi force-pushed the remote_function_fix branch from 8a84034 to 017c094 Compare May 5, 2023 21:07
@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3838 (017c094) into master (10663b3) will decrease coverage by 0.91%.
The diff coverage is 56.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3838      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.88%   88.97%   -0.91%     
==========================================
  Files        1060      247     -813     
  Lines      101208    25161   -76047     
==========================================
- Hits        90973    22388   -68585     
+ Misses      10235     2773    -7462     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/session.py 78.28% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/tensorflow/model.py 96.33% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/lineage/query.py 76.92% <46.73%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/automl/automl.py 89.96% <62.50%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/djl_inference/model.py 91.25% <81.25%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/djl_inference/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/djl_inference/defaults.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/remote_function/client.py 96.90% <100.00%> (ø)
...runtime_environment/runtime_environment_manager.py 79.75% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1298 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Collaborator

@claytonparnell claytonparnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/bot run slow-tests

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 017c094
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@knikure knikure merged commit 1caab81 into aws:master May 8, 2023
knikure pushed a commit to knikure/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request May 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants