Skip to content

Conversation

@keerthanvasist
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Correct documentation error - label and predicted_label can be used together.

Testing done: No tests. Just a documentation change

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backword compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
  • I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
  • I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-unit-tests
  • Commit ID: 33fe652
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #3283 (33fe652) into master (38b4916) will decrease coverage by 0.37%.
The diff coverage is 96.48%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3283      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.40%   89.03%   -0.38%     
==========================================
  Files         848      203     -645     
  Lines       72563    18275   -54288     
==========================================
- Hits        64877    16271   -48606     
+ Misses       7686     2004    -5682     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sagemaker/inputs.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/jumpstart/types.py 94.37% <0.00%> (ø)
src/sagemaker/workflow/step_collections.py 93.87% <ø> (ø)
src/sagemaker/job.py 90.00% <75.00%> (-0.55%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/chainer/model.py 96.49% <88.88%> (-1.07%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/estimator.py 89.55% <90.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
src/sagemaker/mxnet/model.py 98.41% <90.00%> (+2.04%) ⬆️
src/sagemaker/pytorch/model.py 96.82% <90.00%> (+11.37%) ⬆️
src/sagemaker/sklearn/model.py 94.73% <90.00%> (+13.10%) ⬆️
src/sagemaker/huggingface/model.py 89.87% <92.85%> (+10.76%) ⬆️
... and 691 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-pr
  • Commit ID: 33fe652
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-local-mode-tests
  • Commit ID: 33fe652
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-slow-tests
  • Commit ID: 33fe652
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-python-sdk-notebook-tests
  • Commit ID: 33fe652
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@BasilBeirouti BasilBeirouti merged commit b27423d into aws:master Aug 16, 2022
JoseJuan98 pushed a commit to JoseJuan98/sagemaker-python-sdk that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants