Skip to content

Conversation

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor

@brkyvz brkyvz commented Nov 10, 2015

Several elements could be drained if the main thread is not fast enough. @zsxwing warned me about a similar problem, but missed it here :( Submitting the fix using a waiter.

cc @tdas

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2015

Test build #45556 has finished for PR 9605 at commit 6d5e50e.

  • This patch fails Scala style tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):\n * class BlockingWriteAheadLog(\n

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2015

Test build #45551 has finished for PR 9605 at commit ed10038.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grammar:it takes time for 3 to get written

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 10, 2015

Test build #45560 has finished for PR 9605 at commit 66f04d8.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):\n * class BlockingWriteAheadLog(\n

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Nov 10, 2015

Also update PR title. :)

@brkyvz brkyvz changed the title [SPARK-11639][STREAMING][FLAKY-TEST] Add waiter to make sure a single element is added [SPARK-11639][STREAMING][FLAKY-TEST] Implement BlockingWriteAheadLog for testing the BatchedWriteAheadLog Nov 11, 2015
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you need this function? Can you use the private method tester to directly access walWriteQueue?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2015

Test build #45580 has finished for PR 9605 at commit c3c177d.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 11, 2015

Test build #2035 has finished for PR 9605 at commit 8f8d410.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@tdas
Copy link
Contributor

tdas commented Nov 11, 2015

I am merging this to master and 1.6. Thanks @brkyvz for getting this done fast

@brkyvz
Copy link
Contributor Author

brkyvz commented Nov 11, 2015

@tdas I guess it didn't merge :(

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2015
…for testing the BatchedWriteAheadLog

Several elements could be drained if the main thread is not fast enough. zsxwing warned me about a similar problem, but missed it here :( Submitting the fix using a waiter.

cc tdas

Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>

Closes #9605 from brkyvz/fix-flaky-test.

(cherry picked from commit 27029bc)
Signed-off-by: Tathagata Das <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 27029bc Nov 11, 2015
dskrvk pushed a commit to dskrvk/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2015
…for testing the BatchedWriteAheadLog

Several elements could be drained if the main thread is not fast enough. zsxwing warned me about a similar problem, but missed it here :( Submitting the fix using a waiter.

cc tdas

Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>

Closes apache#9605 from brkyvz/fix-flaky-test.
@brkyvz brkyvz deleted the fix-flaky-test branch February 3, 2019 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants