From 36492f4f461527d07c7fa5640a379acfbac676a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Dusenberry <dusenberrymw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:18:48 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fixing broken trainImplicit example in MLlib Collaborative
 Filtering documentation to match one of the possible ALS.trainImplicit
 function signatures.

---
 docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md b/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
index 7b397e30b2d9..dfdf6216b270 100644
--- a/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
+++ b/docs/mllib-collaborative-filtering.md
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ other signals), you can use the `trainImplicit` method to get better results.
 
 {% highlight scala %}
 val alpha = 0.01
-val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank, numIterations, alpha)
+val lambda = 0.01
+val model = ALS.trainImplicit(ratings, rank, numIterations, lambda, alpha)
 {% endhighlight %}
 </div>