-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.9k
[SPARK-18403][SQL] Fix unsafe data false sharing issue in ObjectHashAggregateExec #15976
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -205,23 +205,19 @@ class ObjectHashAggregateSuite | |
| // A TypedImperativeAggregate function | ||
| val typed = percentile_approx($"c0", 0.5) | ||
|
|
||
| // A Hive UDAF without partial aggregation support | ||
| val withoutPartial = function("hive_max", $"c1") | ||
|
|
||
| // A Spark SQL native aggregate function with partial aggregation support that can be executed | ||
| // by the Tungsten `HashAggregateExec` | ||
| val withPartialUnsafe = max($"c2") | ||
| val withPartialUnsafe = max($"c1") | ||
|
|
||
| // A Spark SQL native aggregate function with partial aggregation support that can only be | ||
| // executed by the Tungsten `HashAggregateExec` | ||
| val withPartialSafe = max($"c3") | ||
| val withPartialSafe = max($"c2") | ||
|
|
||
| // A Spark SQL native distinct aggregate function | ||
| val withDistinct = countDistinct($"c4") | ||
| val withDistinct = countDistinct($"c3") | ||
|
|
||
| val allAggs = Seq( | ||
| "typed" -> typed, | ||
| "without partial" -> withoutPartial, | ||
| "with partial + unsafe" -> withPartialUnsafe, | ||
| "with partial + safe" -> withPartialSafe, | ||
| "with distinct" -> withDistinct | ||
|
|
@@ -276,10 +272,9 @@ class ObjectHashAggregateSuite | |
| // Generates a random schema for the randomized data generator | ||
| val schema = new StructType() | ||
| .add("c0", numericTypes(random.nextInt(numericTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c1", orderedTypes(random.nextInt(orderedTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c2", fixedLengthTypes(random.nextInt(fixedLengthTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c3", varLenOrderedTypes(random.nextInt(varLenOrderedTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c4", allTypes(random.nextInt(allTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c1", fixedLengthTypes(random.nextInt(fixedLengthTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c2", varLenOrderedTypes(random.nextInt(varLenOrderedTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
| .add("c3", allTypes(random.nextInt(allTypes.length)), nullable = true) | ||
|
|
||
| logInfo( | ||
| s"""Using the following random schema to generate all the randomized aggregation tests: | ||
|
|
@@ -325,70 +320,67 @@ class ObjectHashAggregateSuite | |
|
|
||
| // Currently Spark SQL doesn't support evaluating distinct aggregate function together | ||
| // with aggregate functions without partial aggregation support. | ||
| if (!(aggs.contains(withoutPartial) && aggs.contains(withDistinct))) { | ||
| // TODO Re-enables them after fixing SPARK-18403 | ||
| ignore( | ||
| s"randomized aggregation test - " + | ||
| s"${names.mkString("[", ", ", "]")} - " + | ||
| s"${if (withGroupingKeys) "with" else "without"} grouping keys - " + | ||
| s"with ${if (emptyInput) "empty" else "non-empty"} input" | ||
| ) { | ||
| var expected: Seq[Row] = null | ||
| var actual1: Seq[Row] = null | ||
| var actual2: Seq[Row] = null | ||
|
|
||
| // Disables `ObjectHashAggregateExec` to obtain a standard answer | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "false") { | ||
| val aggDf = doAggregation(df) | ||
|
|
||
| if (aggs.intersect(Seq(withoutPartial, withPartialSafe, typed)).nonEmpty) { | ||
| assert(containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| expected = aggDf.collect().toSeq | ||
| test( | ||
| s"randomized aggregation test - " + | ||
| s"${names.mkString("[", ", ", "]")} - " + | ||
| s"${if (withGroupingKeys) "with" else "without"} grouping keys - " + | ||
| s"with ${if (emptyInput) "empty" else "non-empty"} input" | ||
| ) { | ||
| var expected: Seq[Row] = null | ||
| var actual1: Seq[Row] = null | ||
| var actual2: Seq[Row] = null | ||
|
|
||
| // Disables `ObjectHashAggregateExec` to obtain a standard answer | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "false") { | ||
| val aggDf = doAggregation(df) | ||
|
|
||
| if (aggs.intersect(Seq(withPartialSafe, typed)).nonEmpty) { | ||
| assert(containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Enables `ObjectHashAggregateExec` | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "true") { | ||
| val aggDf = doAggregation(df) | ||
|
|
||
| if (aggs.contains(typed) && !aggs.contains(withoutPartial)) { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else if (aggs.intersect(Seq(withoutPartial, withPartialSafe)).nonEmpty) { | ||
| assert(containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Disables sort-based aggregation fallback (we only generate 50 rows, so 100 is | ||
| // big enough) to obtain a result to be checked. | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "100") { | ||
| actual1 = aggDf.collect().toSeq | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Enables sort-based aggregation fallback to obtain another result to be checked. | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "3") { | ||
| // Here we are not reusing `aggDf` because the physical plan in `aggDf` is | ||
| // cached and won't be re-planned using the new fallback threshold. | ||
| actual2 = doAggregation(df).collect().toSeq | ||
| } | ||
| expected = aggDf.collect().toSeq | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Enables `ObjectHashAggregateExec` | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "true") { | ||
| val aggDf = doAggregation(df) | ||
|
|
||
| if (aggs.contains(typed)) { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else if (aggs.contains(withPartialSafe)) { | ||
| assert(containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } else { | ||
| assert(!containsSortAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(!containsObjectHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| assert(containsHashAggregateExec(aggDf)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| doubleSafeCheckRows(actual1, expected, 1e-4) | ||
| doubleSafeCheckRows(actual2, expected, 1e-4) | ||
| // Disables sort-based aggregation fallback (we only generate 50 rows, so 100 is | ||
| // big enough) to obtain a result to be checked. | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "100") { | ||
| actual1 = aggDf.collect().toSeq | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Enables sort-based aggregation fallback to obtain another result to be checked. | ||
| withSQLConf(SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "3") { | ||
| // Here we are not reusing `aggDf` because the physical plan in `aggDf` is | ||
| // cached and won't be re-planned using the new fallback threshold. | ||
| actual2 = doAggregation(df).collect().toSeq | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| doubleSafeCheckRows(actual1, expected, 1e-4) | ||
| doubleSafeCheckRows(actual2, expected, 1e-4) | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -425,7 +417,35 @@ class ObjectHashAggregateSuite | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private def function(name: String, args: Column*): Column = { | ||
| Column(UnresolvedFunction(FunctionIdentifier(name), args.map(_.expr), isDistinct = false)) | ||
| test("SPARK-18403 Fix unsafe data false sharing issue in ObjectHashAggregateExec") { | ||
| // SPARK-18403: An unsafe data false sharing issue may trigger OOM / SIGSEGV when evaluating | ||
| // certain aggregate functions. To reproduce this issue, the following conditions must be | ||
| // met: | ||
| // | ||
| // 1. The aggregation must be evaluated using `ObjectHashAggregateExec`; | ||
| // 2. There must be an input column whose data type involves `ArrayType` or `MapType`; | ||
| // 3. Sort-based aggregation fallback must be triggered during evaluation. | ||
| withSQLConf( | ||
| SQLConf.USE_OBJECT_HASH_AGG.key -> "true", | ||
| SQLConf.OBJECT_AGG_SORT_BASED_FALLBACK_THRESHOLD.key -> "1" | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. not related to this PR, but the config name looks weird, how about |
||
| ) { | ||
| checkAnswer( | ||
| Seq | ||
| .fill(2)(Tuple1(Array.empty[Int])) | ||
| .toDF("c0") | ||
| .groupBy(lit(1)) | ||
| .agg(typed_count($"c0"), max($"c0")), | ||
| Row(1, 2, Array.empty[Int]) | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| checkAnswer( | ||
| Seq | ||
| .fill(2)(Tuple1(Map.empty[Int, Int])) | ||
| .toDF("c0") | ||
| .groupBy(lit(1)) | ||
| .agg(typed_count($"c0"), first($"c0")), | ||
| Row(1, 2, Map.empty[Int, Int]) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the problem is, during
processRowwe cache the input row somehow?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's caused by
MutableProjection? AsMutableProjectionmay keep an "pointer" that points to a memory region of an unsafe row. Maybe we can fix this bug by #15082?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nvm, #15082 needs some significant refactor, we should get this fix in 2.1 first.