Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor

Please help to review, thanks a lot.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 8, 2015

Test build #47323 has finished for PR 10195 at commit 7123967.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not just reuse spark.submit.deployMode? Would that work? Now there's both of these and it's a little confusing.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, I see. My previous thought is that spark.submit.deployMode is only for internal use, so I picked another configuration name. I don't have strong opinion on either one, I will change it.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 15, 2015

Test build #47708 has finished for PR 10195 at commit c9a634c.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@jerryshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jenkins, retest this please.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 15, 2015

Test build #47715 has finished for PR 10195 at commit c9a634c.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 63ccdef Dec 16, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants