Skip to content

Conversation

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

Fixes a server-side rendering error in the BlockScrollStrategy, because it was referring to the global document.

Relates to #9066.

Fixes a server-side rendering error in the `BlockScrollStrategy`, because it was referring to the global `document`.

Relates to angular#9066.
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner January 29, 2018 18:08
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jan 29, 2018
@crisbeto crisbeto mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2018
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release and removed pr: needs review labels Jan 30, 2018
@tinayuangao tinayuangao merged commit 3acbf26 into angular:master Feb 1, 2018
mmalerba pushed a commit to mmalerba/components that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2018
Fixes a server-side rendering error in the `BlockScrollStrategy`, because it was referring to the global `document`.

Relates to angular#9066.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants