Skip to content

Conversation

@LeonardoGastonRossi
Copy link

@LeonardoGastonRossi LeonardoGastonRossi commented Sep 22, 2018

This is a defect that was already fixed in #12624. But in my project we need this defect fixed in 6.4.X. I changed exactly the same files. The PR is exactly the same but targeting to 6.4.X.

  • Fixes the position of flexible overlays with pushing enabled being thrown off once the user starts scrolling.
  • Fixes flexible overlays with pushing not handling locked positioning. With these changes locked overlays will only be pushed when they're opened, whereas non-locked overlays will stay in the viewport, even when the user scrolls down.
  • Fixes a potential issue due to a couple of variables being initialized together where one is set to zero and the other one is undefined.

Fixes #11365.

…ng to be merge into 6.4.X.

* Fixes the position of flexible overlays with pushing enabled being thrown off once the user starts scrolling.
* Fixes flexible overlays with pushing not handling locked positioning. With these changes locked overlays will only be pushed when they're opened, whereas non-locked overlays will stay in the viewport, even when the user scrolls down.
* Fixes a potential issue due to a couple of variables being initialized together where one is set to zero and the other one is undefined.

Fixes angular#11365.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Sep 22, 2018
@LeonardoGastonRossi
Copy link
Author

for some reason the CI is running against the lint rules from master.
Same happend in #13129

@LeonardoGastonRossi
Copy link
Author

@crisbeto @jelbourn @andrewseguin guys, sorry, me again. Could you take a look to this when you have time, pls?

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto could you review this one?

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn this seems to be a cherry pick of my changes from #12624. The difference is that they're targeting the 6.4.x branch.

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

Yeah, I just wanted to make sure it was a clean cherrypick

Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Sep 25, 2018
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Sep 25, 2018

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr" is failing
    pending missing required labels: target: *

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

Looks good @jelbourn.

@jelbourn jelbourn added the target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release label Oct 2, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 10, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants