Skip to content

Conversation

@jip
Copy link
Contributor

@jip jip commented Jun 9, 2021

Despite the recommendation, no change has been made in xGBT02, xGET02, xGTT02, xTBT02, xTPT02, and xTRT02 for C,Z datatypes yet: as it was noted afterwards in PR #571, those routines are using mixed types of norm: 1-norm for op(A) and taxicab-based norm |Re(z)|+|Im(z)| for residual.

…PACK#562)

Despite the recommendation, no change has been made in xGBT02, xGET02, xGTT02, xTBT02, xTPT02,
and xTRT02 for C,Z datatypes yet: as it was noted afterwards in PR Reference-LAPACK#571, those routines are
using mixed types of norm: 1-norm for op(A) and taxicab-based norm |Re(z)|+|Im(z)| for residual.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #581 (1825be6) into master (0448336) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #581   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.37%   82.37%           
=======================================
  Files        1894     1894           
  Lines      190679   190679           
=======================================
  Hits       157065   157065           
  Misses      33614    33614           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0448336...1825be6. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

@weslleyspereira weslleyspereira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job! Thanks.

@langou langou merged commit 34c8291 into Reference-LAPACK:master Jun 9, 2021
@jip jip mentioned this pull request Jun 14, 2021
@julielangou julielangou added this to the LAPACK 3.10.0 milestone Nov 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants