updated version #13874
updated version #13874
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@haroonurasheed-rs is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates to the Remote-Retrieval API, including new modules for retrieving all orders and creating device return orders. It also adds utility functions for URL parameter extraction and establishes a polling mechanism for API interactions. Additionally, the application’s structure has been simplified by removing certain properties and methods, shifting to cursor-based pagination for order retrieval. The package version has been incremented to reflect these changes. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- components/remote_retrieval/README.md (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/actions/all-orders/all-orders.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/remote_retrieval.app.mjs (3 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/sources/common/events.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/sources/common/polling.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/remote_retrieval/sources/new-device-return-order/new-device-return-order.mjs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- components/remote_retrieval/README.md
- components/remote_retrieval/package.json
- components/remote_retrieval/sources/common/events.mjs
Additional comments not posted (4)
components/remote_retrieval/sources/common/base.mjs (1)
1-14: Well-structured module definition.This file introduces a well-structured module with clear properties and a placeholder method. The use of
ConfigurationErroris appropriate for methods that are not yet implemented, ensuring that any accidental calls during development will be flagged clearly.
- The
propssection is cleanly defined, linking to the application and database services.- The
methodssection currently contains a placeholder which correctly throws a configuration error, indicating that it needs to be implemented.Overall, the structure and error handling in this module are well done.
components/remote_retrieval/actions/all-orders/all-orders.mjs (1)
1-23: Well-implemented action for retrieving all orders.The
Get All Ordersaction is well-implemented with clear documentation and versioning. The asynchronousrunmethod is structured to handle responses effectively and exports a summary of the results, which is a good practice for monitoring and logging.
- The metadata such as
key,name,description, andversionare clearly defined, enhancing the module's discoverability and usability.- The implementation of the
runmethod is robust, handling the asynchronous operation and result processing effectively.This module is a solid addition to the application, facilitating important functionality with good coding practices.
components/remote_retrieval/actions/create-device-order/create-device-order.mjs (2)
1-1: Approved import statement.The import of
appis correctly done from the relative path.
122-128: Approved method implementation.The
createDeviceReturnmethod is well-implemented, making use of theapp.postmethod effectively. The flexible parameter handling with spread syntax (...args) is a good practice for API interactions.
| function getParamFromUrl(url, key = "cursor") { | ||
| if (!url) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| const parsedUrl = new URL(url); | ||
| return parsedUrl.searchParams.get(key); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance error handling in getParamFromUrl.
The getParamFromUrl function is a useful addition for extracting parameters from URLs. However, the current implementation does not handle exceptions that may be thrown by the URL constructor when given an invalid URL. This could lead to unhandled exceptions if the URL format is incorrect.
Consider adding a try-catch block around the URL constructor to handle these cases gracefully:
function getParamFromUrl(url, key = "cursor") {
if (!url) {
return null;
}
+ try {
const parsedUrl = new URL(url);
return parsedUrl.searchParams.get(key);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Invalid URL provided:", url);
+ return null;
+ }
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function getParamFromUrl(url, key = "cursor") { | |
| if (!url) { | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| const parsedUrl = new URL(url); | |
| return parsedUrl.searchParams.get(key); | |
| } | |
| function getParamFromUrl(url, key = "cursor") { | |
| if (!url) { | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const parsedUrl = new URL(url); | |
| return parsedUrl.searchParams.get(key); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Invalid URL provided:", url); | |
| return null; | |
| } | |
| } |
| description: "Employee full name to print on the shipping label." | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoAdd_1: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info Address Line 1", | ||
| description: "The first line of the employee address" | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoAdd_2: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info Address Line 2", | ||
| description: "The second line is optional for employee address", | ||
| optional: true , | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoCity: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info City", | ||
| description: "City of employee", | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoState: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info State", | ||
| description: "State of employee", | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoZip: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info Zip", | ||
| description: "Zip code of employee", | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoPhone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info Phone", | ||
| description: "Phone of employee", | ||
| }, | ||
| employeeInfoCountry: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Employee Info Country", | ||
| description: "This service is only for USA", | ||
| options: ["US"], | ||
| default: "US", | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| companyInfoPerson: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Person Name", | ||
| description: "Receipient Name" | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoCompanyName: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Company Name", | ||
| description: "Company Name" | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoAdd_1: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Address Line 1", | ||
| description: "The first line of the company address" | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoAdd_2: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Address Line 2", | ||
| description: "The second line is optional for company address", | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoCity: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info City", | ||
| description: "Company city", | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoState: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info State", | ||
| description: "Company State(Example: TX,AL,NJ)", | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoZip: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Zip", | ||
| description: "Company Zip", | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoPhone: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Phone", | ||
| description: "Company Phone", | ||
| }, | ||
| companyInfoEmail: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Company Info Email", | ||
| description: "Company Email", | ||
| }, | ||
| typeOfEquipment: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Type of Equipment", | ||
| description: "You can choose 'Laptop' or 'Monitor'", | ||
| options: ['Laptop','Monitor'], | ||
| default: "Laptop" | ||
| }, | ||
| orderType: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Order Type", | ||
| description: "You can choose 'Return to Company' or 'Sell this Equipment'", | ||
| options: ['Return to Company','Sell this Equipment'], | ||
| default: "Return to Company" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well-structured properties with clear documentation.
The properties are well-defined with appropriate types, labels, and descriptions. The use of default values and options enhances user experience and input validation.
Suggestion for improvement:
Ensure consistency in marking optional fields. For example, employeeInfoAdd_2 and companyInfoAdd_2 are marked as optional, but it's not clear if other fields like companyInfoEmail are optional or required.
| async run({ $: step }) { | ||
| const { | ||
| employeeInfoEmail, | ||
| employeeInfoName, | ||
| employeeInfoAdd_1, | ||
| employeeInfoAdd_2, | ||
| employeeInfoCity, | ||
| employeeInfoState, | ||
| employeeInfoZip, | ||
| employeeInfoPhone, | ||
| companyInfoPerson, | ||
| companyInfoCompanyName, | ||
| companyInfoAdd_1, | ||
| companyInfoAdd_2, | ||
| companyInfoCity, | ||
| companyInfoState, | ||
| companyInfoZip, | ||
| companyInfoPhone, | ||
| companyInfoEmail, | ||
| typeOfEquipment, | ||
| orderType | ||
|
|
||
| } = this; | ||
|
|
||
| const response = await createDeviceReturn({ | ||
| step, | ||
| data: { | ||
| type_of_equipment: typeOfEquipment, | ||
| order_type: orderType, | ||
| employee_info: { | ||
| email: employeeInfoEmail, | ||
| name: employeeInfoName, | ||
| address_line_1: employeeInfoAdd_1, | ||
| address_line_2: employeeInfoAdd_2, | ||
| address_city: employeeInfoCity, | ||
| address_state: employeeInfoState, | ||
| address_zip: employeeInfoZip, | ||
| phone: employeeInfoPhone, | ||
| }, | ||
| company_info: { | ||
| return_person_name: companyInfoPerson, | ||
| return_company_name: companyInfoCompanyName, | ||
| return_address_line_1: companyInfoAdd_1, | ||
| return_address_line_2: companyInfoAdd_2, | ||
| return_address_city: companyInfoCity, | ||
| return_address_state: companyInfoState, | ||
| return_address_zip: companyInfoZip, | ||
| email: companyInfoEmail, | ||
| phone: companyInfoPhone, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| step.export("$summary", `Successfully created device return order with ID \`${response.order}\``); | ||
|
|
||
| return response; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well-implemented run function with clear process flow.
The run function is well-structured, using destructuring for clarity and handling the API response effectively. The feedback mechanism using step.export is appropriately used.
Suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding error handling for the API call to manage exceptions and provide error feedback to the user.
|
Hello everyone, I have tested this PR and there're some test cases failed or needed improvement. Please check the test report below for more information |
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation