Fixing syntax of security in TicTacToe OpenAPI example #84
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
February 16, 2024 07:53
…in Redocly. Fixed syntax in application of security to the operations. Security is an array.
…t respect the differences in the operation security (as was previously).
Contributor
|
Thanks for spotting and fixing this @karelhusa, these should indeed be array elements. I have one question about the security on the |
Member
|
PR #102 has incorporated this fix, so between that and the lack of reply for a few months I'm going to close this PR in favor of that one. But thank you for submitting it as it helped spot an error in the other PR's version of this! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The provided tictactoe.yaml OpenAPI example is not valid and fails to be rendered in Redocly.
Security element's type is an array. I have fixed the syntax in security of the operations.