Consisent x- Param/Encoding/Header wording (3.0.4) #3919
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It was a bit challenging to figure out where to put the wording about allowing extension parameters when there are multiple fixed fields tables, each in their own subsection. For the Parameter Object (the only one with multiple tables in past releases), it had been after the last table, but that got further and further away from what felt like the main part of the Object description. I thought I had put it consistently after the initial "Common Fixed Fields" table, but I put it even before that in one place (which we don't do anywhere), and I forgot to include it in the Header Object at all. This change puts it after the Common Fixed Fields table for all three, which means that for all Objects it is immediately after the first Fixed Fields table.
handrews
added
bug
param serialization
ralfhandl
approved these changes
Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was a bit challenging to figure out where to put the wording about allowing extension parameters when there are multiple fixed fields tables, each in their own subsection.
For the Parameter Object (the only one with multiple tables in past releases), it had been after the last table, but that got further and further away from what felt like the main part of the Object description.
I thought I had put it consistently after the initial "Common Fixed Fields" table, but I put it even before that in one place (which we don't do anywhere), and I forgot to include it in the Header Object at all.
This change puts it after the Common Fixed Fields table for all three, which means that for all Objects it is immediately after the first Fixed Fields table. Note that the Encoding Object is not in this diff as the line was in the right place already for that Object.