Skip to content

Conversation

@ekomarova
Copy link
Contributor

@ekomarova ekomarova commented May 23, 2024

This PR just fixes a small inaccuracy in the name: SAT-6766

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to an issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

@ekomarova ekomarova requested review from ZzEeKkAa and diptorupd May 23, 2024 14:14
Copy link
Contributor

@ZzEeKkAa ZzEeKkAa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@ZzEeKkAa ZzEeKkAa enabled auto-merge May 23, 2024 14:25
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented May 23, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 86.486% (-0.01%) from 86.5%
when pulling d5ccff5 on sat-6766
into f09c42e on main.

@ZzEeKkAa ZzEeKkAa merged commit b9436c1 into main May 23, 2024
@ZzEeKkAa ZzEeKkAa deleted the sat-6766 branch May 23, 2024 14:59
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Set correct package name in README.md b9436c1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants