Skip to content

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot commented Aug 19, 2025

Features 💎

  • Checkout API

    • Add encryptedPassword attribute in CardDetails
    • Add ResponseAdditionalDataSwish
  • Terminal API

    • Add ScanBarcodeResult event type
  • Management API

    • Add unreferenced attribute in Refunds

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2025 11:31
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces an automated update to the client library, incorporating the latest changes from the OpenAPI specification. The most notable enhancement is the expanded support for various local bank account identification types within the BankAccountAccountIdentification schema, which will facilitate broader international banking operations. Additionally, the update includes extensive code formatting and import reordering across multiple files, contributing to overall code quality and maintainability.

Highlights

  • Expanded Bank Account Identification Support: The generated code now supports a significantly broader range of local bank account identification types, enhancing compatibility for various regions including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Hong Kong, Hungary, Norway, New Zealand, Poland, Sweden, Singapore, United Kingdom, and United States.
  • Code Formatting and Import Optimization: Numerous files across both acswebhooks and balanceplatform modules have undergone general code formatting and import reordering, improving code readability and consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request appears to be an automated update from an OpenAPI specification. The changes are primarily formatting adjustments across a large number of model and service files, such as indentation, line breaks, and Javadoc comment styling. The most significant change is in BankAccountAccountIdentification.java, which now implements a oneOf schema with a custom serializer and deserializer, a standard pattern for generated code. After a thorough review, the changes seem correct and consistent with an automated tool run, and I found no functional issues or bugs.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 4 times, most recently from e3db8ca to 1b40df1 Compare August 25, 2025 11:09
@gcatanese gcatanese force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch from 45ea8e6 to 5e219aa Compare August 27, 2025 13:55
@gcatanese gcatanese merged commit 008d267 into main Aug 27, 2025
5 checks passed
@gcatanese gcatanese added the Feature Indicates a new feature addition label Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Feature Indicates a new feature addition

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants