-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
Improve generated code in JSON class #1522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the generated JSON class by enhancing its structure and configuration, alongside a minor code simplification in AbstractOpenApiSchema. The changes aim to enforce better design patterns, correct serialization/deserialization behavior, and modernize Java syntax in the generated code.
Highlights
- JSON.java Configuration & Structure: The
JSON()constructor was made private to enforce the Singleton pattern. Crucially, theALLOW_COERCION_OF_SCALARSsetting for theObjectMapperwas corrected fromfalsetotrueand is now properly applied to themapperinstance, which impacts how scalar values are handled during deserialization. - Code Modernization & Immutability: The diamond operator (
<>) was applied toHashSetandHashMapinstantiations for improved readability and conciseness. Additionally,modelDiscriminatorsandmodelDescendantsfields were marked asfinalto promote immutability. - Code Simplification: The
isNullable()method inAbstractOpenApiSchema.mustachewas refactored for a more concise boolean return statement.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several good improvements to the generated JSON.java class. Key changes include making the constructor private to enforce a singleton pattern, marking collection fields as final, using the diamond operator for cleaner generic type instantiation, and fixing a bug in the configuration of the Jackson ObjectMapper. The code is clearer and more robust as a result. I have one minor suggestion to improve consistency in the use of the diamond operator.
106d0a1 to
97f74fc
Compare
Improve the generated
JSON.java:<>ALLOW_COERCION_OF_SCALARS